diff options
| author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2025-04-25 13:36:21 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2025-04-28 14:36:41 +0200 |
| commit | b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 (patch) | |
| tree | d43c68fe6df26b914ac8033be2ae06b0a54cb44c /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | |
| parent | 3d59224947b024c9b2aa6e149a1537d449adb828 (diff) | |
cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are used
Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and
policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were
accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the
functions called by it. Consequently, the changes made by that commit
led to problems with setting policy limits.
Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq()
and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the
functions called by the latter.
Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/
Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index acf19b0042bb..f45ded62b0e0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -536,14 +536,18 @@ void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_disable_fast_switch); static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation) + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + unsigned int relation) { unsigned int idx; + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); + if (!policy->freq_table) return target_freq; - idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation); + idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, min, max, relation); policy->cached_resolved_idx = idx; policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq; return policy->freq_table[idx].frequency; @@ -577,8 +581,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (unlikely(min > max)) min = max; - return __resolve_freq(policy, clamp_val(target_freq, min, max), - CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE); + return __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, min, max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq); @@ -2397,8 +2400,8 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (cpufreq_disabled()) return -ENODEV; - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); - target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, relation); + target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, policy->min, + policy->max, relation); pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n", policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq); @@ -2727,8 +2730,11 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, * compiler optimizations around them because they may be accessed * concurrently by cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() during the update. */ - WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H)); - new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); + WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max, + new_data.min, new_data.max, + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H)); + new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, new_data.min, + new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); WRITE_ONCE(policy->min, new_data.min > policy->max ? policy->max : new_data.min); trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy); |