summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>2025-11-05 09:37:47 +0100
committerChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>2025-11-05 22:59:31 +0100
commit73fd0dba0beb1d2d1695ee5452eac8dfabce3f9e (patch)
tree282072941bb3b6e6498d8e7b37d3cbbd99f0a9f7 /fs/btrfs
parent5b8ed52866e3d19e02860c7cf1d6bbbd70b619e9 (diff)
parentab5f296076f3cd43470e2f70db61c9fd258db85b (diff)
Merge patch series "fs: introduce super write guard"
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> says: I'm in the process of adding a few more guards for vfs constructs. I've chosen the easy case of super_start_write() and super_end_write() and converted eligible callers. I think long-term we can move a lot of the manual placement to completely rely on guards - where sensible. * patches from https://patch.msgid.link/20251104-work-guards-v1-0-5108ac78a171@kernel.org: xfs: use super write guard in xfs_file_ioctl() open: use super write guard in do_ftruncate() btrfs: use super write guard in relocating_repair_kthread() ext4: use super write guard in write_mmp_block() btrfs: use super write guard in sb_start_write() btrfs: use super write guard btrfs_run_defrag_inode() btrfs: use super write guard in btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work() fs: add super_write_guard Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251104-work-guards-v1-0-5108ac78a171@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/block-group.c10
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/defrag.c7
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/volumes.c9
3 files changed, 10 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 5322ef2ae015..08cdda47509f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1850,12 +1850,10 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!btrfs_should_reclaim(fs_info))
return;
- sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
+ guard(super_write)(fs_info->sb);
- if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
+ if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE))
return;
- }
/*
* Long running balances can keep us blocked here for eternity, so
@@ -1863,7 +1861,6 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
*/
if (!mutex_trylock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock)) {
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return;
}
@@ -1947,7 +1944,7 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
/*
* Get out fast, in case we're read-only or unmounting the
* filesystem. It is OK to drop block groups from the list even
- * for the read-only case. As we did sb_start_write(),
+ * for the read-only case. As we did take the super write lock,
* "mount -o remount,ro" won't happen and read-only filesystem
* means it is forced read-only due to a fatal error. So, it
* never gets back to read-write to let us reclaim again.
@@ -2030,7 +2027,6 @@ end:
list_splice_tail(&retry_list, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
}
void btrfs_reclaim_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/defrag.c b/fs/btrfs/defrag.c
index 7b277934f66f..35fb8ee164dc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/defrag.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/defrag.c
@@ -254,10 +254,9 @@ again:
range.extent_thresh = defrag->extent_thresh;
file_ra_state_init(ra, inode->vfs_inode.i_mapping);
- sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
- ret = btrfs_defrag_file(inode, ra, &range, defrag->transid,
- BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
+ scoped_guard(super_write, fs_info->sb)
+ ret = btrfs_defrag_file(inode, ra, &range,
+ defrag->transid, BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH);
iput(&inode->vfs_inode);
if (ret < 0)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 2bec544d8ba3..88065e52184c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4660,12 +4660,12 @@ static int balance_kthread(void *data)
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = data;
int ret = 0;
- sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
+ guard(super_write)(fs_info->sb);
+
mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (fs_info->balance_ctl)
ret = btrfs_balance(fs_info, fs_info->balance_ctl, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return ret;
}
@@ -8177,12 +8177,12 @@ static int relocating_repair_kthread(void *data)
target = cache->start;
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
- sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
+ guard(super_write)(fs_info->sb);
+
if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"zoned: skip relocating block group %llu to repair: EBUSY",
target);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -8210,7 +8210,6 @@ out:
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
- sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return ret;
}