diff options
| author | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> | 2025-11-09 15:47:19 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> | 2025-11-11 11:03:38 -0800 |
| commit | 37919e239ebb2cba573cca56292f7c39fa6d7415 (patch) | |
| tree | 2f751333b346d17a8349aa1a33d8bc0147963fec /lib/crypto | |
| parent | 3d176751e541362ff40c2478d6a2de41f8c62318 (diff) | |
lib/crypto: arm64/polyval: Migrate optimized code into library
Migrate the arm64 implementation of POLYVAL into lib/crypto/, wiring it
up to the POLYVAL library interface. This makes the POLYVAL library be
properly optimized on arm64.
This drops the arm64 optimizations of polyval in the crypto_shash API.
That's fine, since polyval will be removed from crypto_shash entirely
since it is unneeded there. But even if it comes back, the crypto_shash
API could just be implemented on top of the library API, as usual.
Adjust the names and prototypes of the assembly functions to align more
closely with the rest of the library code.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251109234726.638437-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/crypto')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/crypto/Kconfig | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/crypto/Makefile | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/crypto/arm64/polyval-ce-core.S | 359 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/crypto/arm64/polyval.h | 82 |
4 files changed, 443 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/crypto/Kconfig b/lib/crypto/Kconfig index 6545f0e83b83..430723994142 100644 --- a/lib/crypto/Kconfig +++ b/lib/crypto/Kconfig @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ config CRYPTO_LIB_POLYVAL config CRYPTO_LIB_POLYVAL_ARCH bool depends on CRYPTO_LIB_POLYVAL && !UML + default y if ARM64 && KERNEL_MODE_NEON config CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305 tristate diff --git a/lib/crypto/Makefile b/lib/crypto/Makefile index 055e44008805..2efa96afcb4b 100644 --- a/lib/crypto/Makefile +++ b/lib/crypto/Makefile @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_POLYVAL) += libpolyval.o libpolyval-y := polyval.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_POLYVAL_ARCH),y) CFLAGS_polyval.o += -I$(src)/$(SRCARCH) +libpolyval-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += arm64/polyval-ce-core.o endif ################################################################################ diff --git a/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval-ce-core.S b/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval-ce-core.S new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7c731a044d02 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval-ce-core.S @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Implementation of POLYVAL using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions. + * + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC + */ +/* + * This is an efficient implementation of POLYVAL using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions + * It works on 8 blocks at a time, by precomputing the first 8 keys powers h^8, + * ..., h^1 in the POLYVAL finite field. This precomputation allows us to split + * finite field multiplication into two steps. + * + * In the first step, we consider h^i, m_i as normal polynomials of degree less + * than 128. We then compute p(x) = h^8m_0 + ... + h^1m_7 where multiplication + * is simply polynomial multiplication. + * + * In the second step, we compute the reduction of p(x) modulo the finite field + * modulus g(x) = x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1. + * + * This two step process is equivalent to computing h^8m_0 + ... + h^1m_7 where + * multiplication is finite field multiplication. The advantage is that the + * two-step process only requires 1 finite field reduction for every 8 + * polynomial multiplications. Further parallelism is gained by interleaving the + * multiplications and polynomial reductions. + */ + +#include <linux/linkage.h> +#define STRIDE_BLOCKS 8 + +ACCUMULATOR .req x0 +KEY_POWERS .req x1 +MSG .req x2 +BLOCKS_LEFT .req x3 +KEY_START .req x10 +EXTRA_BYTES .req x11 +TMP .req x13 + +M0 .req v0 +M1 .req v1 +M2 .req v2 +M3 .req v3 +M4 .req v4 +M5 .req v5 +M6 .req v6 +M7 .req v7 +KEY8 .req v8 +KEY7 .req v9 +KEY6 .req v10 +KEY5 .req v11 +KEY4 .req v12 +KEY3 .req v13 +KEY2 .req v14 +KEY1 .req v15 +PL .req v16 +PH .req v17 +TMP_V .req v18 +LO .req v20 +MI .req v21 +HI .req v22 +SUM .req v23 +GSTAR .req v24 + + .text + + .arch armv8-a+crypto + .align 4 + +.Lgstar: + .quad 0xc200000000000000, 0xc200000000000000 + +/* + * Computes the product of two 128-bit polynomials in X and Y and XORs the + * components of the 256-bit product into LO, MI, HI. + * + * Given: + * X = [X_1 : X_0] + * Y = [Y_1 : Y_0] + * + * We compute: + * LO += X_0 * Y_0 + * MI += (X_0 + X_1) * (Y_0 + Y_1) + * HI += X_1 * Y_1 + * + * Later, the 256-bit result can be extracted as: + * [HI_1 : HI_0 + HI_1 + MI_1 + LO_1 : LO_1 + HI_0 + MI_0 + LO_0 : LO_0] + * This step is done when computing the polynomial reduction for efficiency + * reasons. + * + * Karatsuba multiplication is used instead of Schoolbook multiplication because + * it was found to be slightly faster on ARM64 CPUs. + * + */ +.macro karatsuba1 X Y + X .req \X + Y .req \Y + ext v25.16b, X.16b, X.16b, #8 + ext v26.16b, Y.16b, Y.16b, #8 + eor v25.16b, v25.16b, X.16b + eor v26.16b, v26.16b, Y.16b + pmull2 v28.1q, X.2d, Y.2d + pmull v29.1q, X.1d, Y.1d + pmull v27.1q, v25.1d, v26.1d + eor HI.16b, HI.16b, v28.16b + eor LO.16b, LO.16b, v29.16b + eor MI.16b, MI.16b, v27.16b + .unreq X + .unreq Y +.endm + +/* + * Same as karatsuba1, except overwrites HI, LO, MI rather than XORing into + * them. + */ +.macro karatsuba1_store X Y + X .req \X + Y .req \Y + ext v25.16b, X.16b, X.16b, #8 + ext v26.16b, Y.16b, Y.16b, #8 + eor v25.16b, v25.16b, X.16b + eor v26.16b, v26.16b, Y.16b + pmull2 HI.1q, X.2d, Y.2d + pmull LO.1q, X.1d, Y.1d + pmull MI.1q, v25.1d, v26.1d + .unreq X + .unreq Y +.endm + +/* + * Computes the 256-bit polynomial represented by LO, HI, MI. Stores + * the result in PL, PH. + * [PH : PL] = + * [HI_1 : HI_1 + HI_0 + MI_1 + LO_1 : HI_0 + MI_0 + LO_1 + LO_0 : LO_0] + */ +.macro karatsuba2 + // v4 = [HI_1 + MI_1 : HI_0 + MI_0] + eor v4.16b, HI.16b, MI.16b + // v4 = [HI_1 + MI_1 + LO_1 : HI_0 + MI_0 + LO_0] + eor v4.16b, v4.16b, LO.16b + // v5 = [HI_0 : LO_1] + ext v5.16b, LO.16b, HI.16b, #8 + // v4 = [HI_1 + HI_0 + MI_1 + LO_1 : HI_0 + MI_0 + LO_1 + LO_0] + eor v4.16b, v4.16b, v5.16b + // HI = [HI_0 : HI_1] + ext HI.16b, HI.16b, HI.16b, #8 + // LO = [LO_0 : LO_1] + ext LO.16b, LO.16b, LO.16b, #8 + // PH = [HI_1 : HI_1 + HI_0 + MI_1 + LO_1] + ext PH.16b, v4.16b, HI.16b, #8 + // PL = [HI_0 + MI_0 + LO_1 + LO_0 : LO_0] + ext PL.16b, LO.16b, v4.16b, #8 +.endm + +/* + * Computes the 128-bit reduction of PH : PL. Stores the result in dest. + * + * This macro computes p(x) mod g(x) where p(x) is in montgomery form and g(x) = + * x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1. + * + * We have a 256-bit polynomial PH : PL = P_3 : P_2 : P_1 : P_0 that is the + * product of two 128-bit polynomials in Montgomery form. We need to reduce it + * mod g(x). Also, since polynomials in Montgomery form have an "extra" factor + * of x^128, this product has two extra factors of x^128. To get it back into + * Montgomery form, we need to remove one of these factors by dividing by x^128. + * + * To accomplish both of these goals, we add multiples of g(x) that cancel out + * the low 128 bits P_1 : P_0, leaving just the high 128 bits. Since the low + * bits are zero, the polynomial division by x^128 can be done by right + * shifting. + * + * Since the only nonzero term in the low 64 bits of g(x) is the constant term, + * the multiple of g(x) needed to cancel out P_0 is P_0 * g(x). The CPU can + * only do 64x64 bit multiplications, so split P_0 * g(x) into x^128 * P_0 + + * x^64 * g*(x) * P_0 + P_0, where g*(x) is bits 64-127 of g(x). Adding this to + * the original polynomial gives P_3 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 : P_1 + T_0 : 0, where T + * = T_1 : T_0 = g*(x) * P_0. Thus, bits 0-63 got "folded" into bits 64-191. + * + * Repeating this same process on the next 64 bits "folds" bits 64-127 into bits + * 128-255, giving the answer in bits 128-255. This time, we need to cancel P_1 + * + T_0 in bits 64-127. The multiple of g(x) required is (P_1 + T_0) * g(x) * + * x^64. Adding this to our previous computation gives P_3 + P_1 + T_0 + V_1 : + * P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + V_0 : 0 : 0, where V = V_1 : V_0 = g*(x) * (P_1 + T_0). + * + * So our final computation is: + * T = T_1 : T_0 = g*(x) * P_0 + * V = V_1 : V_0 = g*(x) * (P_1 + T_0) + * p(x) / x^{128} mod g(x) = P_3 + P_1 + T_0 + V_1 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + V_0 + * + * The implementation below saves a XOR instruction by computing P_1 + T_0 : P_0 + * + T_1 and XORing into dest, rather than separately XORing P_1 : P_0 and T_0 : + * T_1 into dest. This allows us to reuse P_1 + T_0 when computing V. + */ +.macro montgomery_reduction dest + DEST .req \dest + // TMP_V = T_1 : T_0 = P_0 * g*(x) + pmull TMP_V.1q, PL.1d, GSTAR.1d + // TMP_V = T_0 : T_1 + ext TMP_V.16b, TMP_V.16b, TMP_V.16b, #8 + // TMP_V = P_1 + T_0 : P_0 + T_1 + eor TMP_V.16b, PL.16b, TMP_V.16b + // PH = P_3 + P_1 + T_0 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + eor PH.16b, PH.16b, TMP_V.16b + // TMP_V = V_1 : V_0 = (P_1 + T_0) * g*(x) + pmull2 TMP_V.1q, TMP_V.2d, GSTAR.2d + eor DEST.16b, PH.16b, TMP_V.16b + .unreq DEST +.endm + +/* + * Compute Polyval on 8 blocks. + * + * If reduce is set, also computes the montgomery reduction of the + * previous full_stride call and XORs with the first message block. + * (m_0 + REDUCE(PL, PH))h^8 + ... + m_7h^1. + * I.e., the first multiplication uses m_0 + REDUCE(PL, PH) instead of m_0. + * + * Sets PL, PH. + */ +.macro full_stride reduce + eor LO.16b, LO.16b, LO.16b + eor MI.16b, MI.16b, MI.16b + eor HI.16b, HI.16b, HI.16b + + ld1 {M0.16b, M1.16b, M2.16b, M3.16b}, [MSG], #64 + ld1 {M4.16b, M5.16b, M6.16b, M7.16b}, [MSG], #64 + + karatsuba1 M7 KEY1 + .if \reduce + pmull TMP_V.1q, PL.1d, GSTAR.1d + .endif + + karatsuba1 M6 KEY2 + .if \reduce + ext TMP_V.16b, TMP_V.16b, TMP_V.16b, #8 + .endif + + karatsuba1 M5 KEY3 + .if \reduce + eor TMP_V.16b, PL.16b, TMP_V.16b + .endif + + karatsuba1 M4 KEY4 + .if \reduce + eor PH.16b, PH.16b, TMP_V.16b + .endif + + karatsuba1 M3 KEY5 + .if \reduce + pmull2 TMP_V.1q, TMP_V.2d, GSTAR.2d + .endif + + karatsuba1 M2 KEY6 + .if \reduce + eor SUM.16b, PH.16b, TMP_V.16b + .endif + + karatsuba1 M1 KEY7 + eor M0.16b, M0.16b, SUM.16b + + karatsuba1 M0 KEY8 + karatsuba2 +.endm + +/* + * Handle any extra blocks after full_stride loop. + */ +.macro partial_stride + add KEY_POWERS, KEY_START, #(STRIDE_BLOCKS << 4) + sub KEY_POWERS, KEY_POWERS, BLOCKS_LEFT, lsl #4 + ld1 {KEY1.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #16 + + ld1 {TMP_V.16b}, [MSG], #16 + eor SUM.16b, SUM.16b, TMP_V.16b + karatsuba1_store KEY1 SUM + sub BLOCKS_LEFT, BLOCKS_LEFT, #1 + + tst BLOCKS_LEFT, #4 + beq .Lpartial4BlocksDone + ld1 {M0.16b, M1.16b, M2.16b, M3.16b}, [MSG], #64 + ld1 {KEY8.16b, KEY7.16b, KEY6.16b, KEY5.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #64 + karatsuba1 M0 KEY8 + karatsuba1 M1 KEY7 + karatsuba1 M2 KEY6 + karatsuba1 M3 KEY5 +.Lpartial4BlocksDone: + tst BLOCKS_LEFT, #2 + beq .Lpartial2BlocksDone + ld1 {M0.16b, M1.16b}, [MSG], #32 + ld1 {KEY8.16b, KEY7.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #32 + karatsuba1 M0 KEY8 + karatsuba1 M1 KEY7 +.Lpartial2BlocksDone: + tst BLOCKS_LEFT, #1 + beq .LpartialDone + ld1 {M0.16b}, [MSG], #16 + ld1 {KEY8.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #16 + karatsuba1 M0 KEY8 +.LpartialDone: + karatsuba2 + montgomery_reduction SUM +.endm + +/* + * Computes a = a * b * x^{-128} mod x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1. + * + * void polyval_mul_pmull(struct polyval_elem *a, + * const struct polyval_elem *b); + */ +SYM_FUNC_START(polyval_mul_pmull) + adr TMP, .Lgstar + ld1 {GSTAR.2d}, [TMP] + ld1 {v0.16b}, [x0] + ld1 {v1.16b}, [x1] + karatsuba1_store v0 v1 + karatsuba2 + montgomery_reduction SUM + st1 {SUM.16b}, [x0] + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(polyval_mul_pmull) + +/* + * Perform polynomial evaluation as specified by POLYVAL. This computes: + * h^n * accumulator + h^n * m_0 + ... + h^1 * m_{n-1} + * where n=nblocks, h is the hash key, and m_i are the message blocks. + * + * x0 - pointer to accumulator + * x1 - pointer to precomputed key powers h^8 ... h^1 + * x2 - pointer to message blocks + * x3 - number of blocks to hash + * + * void polyval_blocks_pmull(struct polyval_elem *acc, + * const struct polyval_key *key, + * const u8 *data, size_t nblocks); + */ +SYM_FUNC_START(polyval_blocks_pmull) + adr TMP, .Lgstar + mov KEY_START, KEY_POWERS + ld1 {GSTAR.2d}, [TMP] + ld1 {SUM.16b}, [ACCUMULATOR] + subs BLOCKS_LEFT, BLOCKS_LEFT, #STRIDE_BLOCKS + blt .LstrideLoopExit + ld1 {KEY8.16b, KEY7.16b, KEY6.16b, KEY5.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #64 + ld1 {KEY4.16b, KEY3.16b, KEY2.16b, KEY1.16b}, [KEY_POWERS], #64 + full_stride 0 + subs BLOCKS_LEFT, BLOCKS_LEFT, #STRIDE_BLOCKS + blt .LstrideLoopExitReduce +.LstrideLoop: + full_stride 1 + subs BLOCKS_LEFT, BLOCKS_LEFT, #STRIDE_BLOCKS + bge .LstrideLoop +.LstrideLoopExitReduce: + montgomery_reduction SUM +.LstrideLoopExit: + adds BLOCKS_LEFT, BLOCKS_LEFT, #STRIDE_BLOCKS + beq .LskipPartial + partial_stride +.LskipPartial: + st1 {SUM.16b}, [ACCUMULATOR] + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(polyval_blocks_pmull) diff --git a/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval.h b/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2486e80750d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/crypto/arm64/polyval.h @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * POLYVAL library functions, arm64 optimized + * + * Copyright 2025 Google LLC + */ +#include <asm/neon.h> +#include <asm/simd.h> +#include <linux/cpufeature.h> + +#define NUM_H_POWERS 8 + +static __ro_after_init DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(have_pmull); + +asmlinkage void polyval_mul_pmull(struct polyval_elem *a, + const struct polyval_elem *b); +asmlinkage void polyval_blocks_pmull(struct polyval_elem *acc, + const struct polyval_key *key, + const u8 *data, size_t nblocks); + +static void polyval_preparekey_arch(struct polyval_key *key, + const u8 raw_key[POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE]) +{ + static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(key->h_powers) == NUM_H_POWERS); + memcpy(&key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1], raw_key, POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + if (static_branch_likely(&have_pmull) && may_use_simd()) { + kernel_neon_begin(); + for (int i = NUM_H_POWERS - 2; i >= 0; i--) { + key->h_powers[i] = key->h_powers[i + 1]; + polyval_mul_pmull(&key->h_powers[i], + &key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1]); + } + kernel_neon_end(); + } else { + for (int i = NUM_H_POWERS - 2; i >= 0; i--) { + key->h_powers[i] = key->h_powers[i + 1]; + polyval_mul_generic(&key->h_powers[i], + &key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1]); + } + } +} + +static void polyval_mul_arch(struct polyval_elem *acc, + const struct polyval_key *key) +{ + if (static_branch_likely(&have_pmull) && may_use_simd()) { + kernel_neon_begin(); + polyval_mul_pmull(acc, &key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1]); + kernel_neon_end(); + } else { + polyval_mul_generic(acc, &key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1]); + } +} + +static void polyval_blocks_arch(struct polyval_elem *acc, + const struct polyval_key *key, + const u8 *data, size_t nblocks) +{ + if (static_branch_likely(&have_pmull) && may_use_simd()) { + do { + /* Allow rescheduling every 4 KiB. */ + size_t n = min_t(size_t, nblocks, + 4096 / POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + + kernel_neon_begin(); + polyval_blocks_pmull(acc, key, data, n); + kernel_neon_end(); + data += n * POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE; + nblocks -= n; + } while (nblocks); + } else { + polyval_blocks_generic(acc, &key->h_powers[NUM_H_POWERS - 1], + data, nblocks); + } +} + +#define polyval_mod_init_arch polyval_mod_init_arch +static void polyval_mod_init_arch(void) +{ + if (cpu_have_named_feature(PMULL)) + static_branch_enable(&have_pmull); +} |