summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rust/kernel/cred.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-10-04Merge tag 'char-misc-6.18-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc Pull Char/Misc/IIO/Binder updates from Greg KH: "Here is the big set of char/misc/iio and other driver subsystem changes for 6.18-rc1. Loads of different stuff in here, it was a busy development cycle in lots of different subsystems, with over 27k new lines added to the tree. Included in here are: - IIO updates including new drivers, reworking of existing apis, and other goodness in the sensor subsystems - MEI driver updates and additions - NVMEM driver updates - slimbus removal for an unused driver and some other minor updates - coresight driver updates and additions - MHI driver updates - comedi driver updates and fixes - extcon driver updates - interconnect driver additions - eeprom driver updates and fixes - minor UIO driver updates - tiny W1 driver updates But the majority of new code is in the rust bindings and additions, which includes: - misc driver rust binding updates for read/write support, we can now write "normal" misc drivers in rust fully, and the sample driver shows how this can be done. - Initial framework for USB driver rust bindings, which are disabled for now in the build, due to limited support, but coming in through this tree due to dependencies on other rust binding changes that were in here. I'll be enabling these back on in the build in the usb.git tree after -rc1 is out so that developers can continue to work on these in linux-next over the next development cycle. - Android Binder driver implemented in Rust. This is the big one, and was driving a huge majority of the rust binding work over the past years. Right now there are two binder drivers in the kernel, selected only at build time as to which one to use as binder wants to be included in the system at boot time. The binder C maintainers all agreed on this, as eventually, they want the C code to be removed from the tree, but it will take a few releases to get there while both are maintained to ensure that the rust implementation is fully stable and compliant with the existing userspace apis. All of these have been in linux-next for a while" * tag 'char-misc-6.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc: (320 commits) rust: usb: keep usb::Device private for now rust: usb: don't retain device context for the interface parent USB: disable rust bindings from the build for now samples: rust: add a USB driver sample rust: usb: add basic USB abstractions coresight: Add label sysfs node support dt-bindings: arm: Add label in the coresight components coresight: tnoc: add new AMBA ID to support Trace Noc V2 coresight: Fix incorrect handling for return value of devm_kzalloc coresight: tpda: fix the logic to setup the element size coresight: trbe: Return NULL pointer for allocation failures coresight: Refactor runtime PM coresight: Make clock sequence consistent coresight: Refactor driver data allocation coresight: Consolidate clock enabling coresight: Avoid enable programming clock duplicately coresight: Appropriately disable trace bus clocks coresight: Appropriately disable programming clocks coresight: etm4x: Support atclk coresight: catu: Support atclk ...
2025-09-19rust_binder: add Rust Binder driverAlice Ryhl
We're generally not proponents of rewrites (nasty uncomfortable things that make you late for dinner!). So why rewrite Binder? Binder has been evolving over the past 15+ years to meet the evolving needs of Android. Its responsibilities, expectations, and complexity have grown considerably during that time. While we expect Binder to continue to evolve along with Android, there are a number of factors that currently constrain our ability to develop/maintain it. Briefly those are: 1. Complexity: Binder is at the intersection of everything in Android and fulfills many responsibilities beyond IPC. It has become many things to many people, and due to its many features and their interactions with each other, its complexity is quite high. In just 6kLOC it must deliver transactions to the right threads. It must correctly parse and translate the contents of transactions, which can contain several objects of different types (e.g., pointers, fds) that can interact with each other. It controls the size of thread pools in userspace, and ensures that transactions are assigned to threads in ways that avoid deadlocks where the threadpool has run out of threads. It must track refcounts of objects that are shared by several processes by forwarding refcount changes between the processes correctly. It must handle numerous error scenarios and it combines/nests 13 different locks, 7 reference counters, and atomic variables. Finally, It must do all of this as fast and efficiently as possible. Minor performance regressions can cause a noticeably degraded user experience. 2. Things to improve: Thousand-line functions [1], error-prone error handling [2], and confusing structure can occur as a code base grows organically. After more than a decade of development, this codebase could use an overhaul. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/android/binder.c?h=v6.5#n2896 [2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/android/binder.c?h=v6.5#n3658 3. Security critical: Binder is a critical part of Android's sandboxing strategy. Even Android's most de-privileged sandboxes (e.g. the Chrome renderer, or SW Codec) have direct access to Binder. More than just about any other component, it's important that Binder provide robust security, and itself be robust against security vulnerabilities. It's #1 (high complexity) that has made continuing to evolve Binder and resolving #2 (tech debt) exceptionally difficult without causing #3 (security issues). For Binder to continue to meet Android's needs, we need better ways to manage (and reduce!) complexity without increasing the risk. The biggest change is obviously the choice of programming language. We decided to use Rust because it directly addresses a number of the challenges within Binder that we have faced during the last years. It prevents mistakes with ref counting, locking, bounds checking, and also does a lot to reduce the complexity of error handling. Additionally, we've been able to use the more expressive type system to encode the ownership semantics of the various structs and pointers, which takes the complexity of managing object lifetimes out of the hands of the programmer, reducing the risk of use-after-frees and similar problems. Rust has many different pointer types that it uses to encode ownership semantics into the type system, and this is probably one of the most important aspects of how it helps in Binder. The Binder driver has a lot of different objects that have complex ownership semantics; some pointers own a refcount, some pointers have exclusive ownership, and some pointers just reference the object and it is kept alive in some other manner. With Rust, we can use a different pointer type for each kind of pointer, which enables the compiler to enforce that the ownership semantics are implemented correctly. Another useful feature is Rust's error handling. Rust allows for more simplified error handling with features such as destructors, and you get compilation failures if errors are not properly handled. This means that even though Rust requires you to spend more lines of code than C on things such as writing down invariants that are left implicit in C, the Rust driver is still slightly smaller than C binder: Rust is 5.5kLOC and C is 5.8kLOC. (These numbers are excluding blank lines, comments, binderfs, and any debugging facilities in C that are not yet implemented in the Rust driver. The numbers include abstractions in rust/kernel/ that are unlikely to be used by other drivers than Binder.) Although this rewrite completely rethinks how the code is structured and how assumptions are enforced, we do not fundamentally change *how* the driver does the things it does. A lot of careful thought has gone into the existing design. The rewrite is aimed rather at improving code health, structure, readability, robustness, security, maintainability and extensibility. We also include more inline documentation, and improve how assumptions in the code are enforced. Furthermore, all unsafe code is annotated with a SAFETY comment that explains why it is correct. We have left the binderfs filesystem component in C. Rewriting it in Rust would be a large amount of work and requires a lot of bindings to the file system interfaces. Binderfs has not historically had the same challenges with security and complexity, so rewriting binderfs seems to have lower value than the rest of Binder. Correctness and feature parity ------------------------------ Rust binder passes all tests that validate the correctness of Binder in the Android Open Source Project. We can boot a device, and run a variety of apps and functionality without issues. We have performed this both on the Cuttlefish Android emulator device, and on a Pixel 6 Pro. As for feature parity, Rust binder currently implements all features that C binder supports, with the exception of some debugging facilities. The missing debugging facilities will be added before we submit the Rust implementation upstream. Tracepoints ----------- I did not include all of the tracepoints as I felt that the mechansim for making C access fields of Rust structs should be discussed on list separately. I also did not include the support for building Rust Binder as a module since that requires exporting a bunch of additional symbols on the C side. Original RFC Link with old benchmark numbers: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231101-rust-binder-v1-0-08ba9197f637@google.com Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Acked-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250919-rust-binder-v2-1-a384b09f28dd@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-19rust,cred: update AlwaysRefCounted import to sync::arefShankari Anand
Update the import of `AlwaysRefCounted` in `cred.rs` to use `sync::aref` instead of `types`. This is part of the ongoing effort to move `ARef` and `AlwaysRefCounted` to the `sync` module for better modularity. Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1173 Signed-off-by: Shankari Anand <shankari.ak0208@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> [PM: subj tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-03-04cred,rust: mark Credential methods inlineAlice Ryhl
When you build the kernel using the llvm-19.1.4-rust-1.83.0-x86_64 toolchain provided by kernel.org with ARCH=arm64, the following symbols are generated: $ nm out-linux/vmlinux | grep ' _R'.*Credential | rustfilt ... T <kernel::cred::Credential>::get_secid ... T <kernel::cred::Credential as kernel::types::AlwaysRefCounted>::dec_ref ... T <kernel::cred::Credential as kernel::types::AlwaysRefCounted>::inc_ref However, these Rust symbols are trivial wrappers around the functions security_cred_getsecid, get_cred, and put_cred respectively. It doesn't make sense to go through a trivial wrapper for these functions, so mark them inline. Also mark other trivial methods inline to prevent similar cases in the future. After applying this patch, the above command will produce no output. Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> [PM: subject tweak, description line trims] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-09-30rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapperAlice Ryhl
Adds a wrapper around `kuid_t` called `Kuid`. This allows us to define various operations on kuids such as equality and current_euid. It also lets us provide conversions from kuid into userspace values. Rust Binder needs these operations because it needs to compare kuids for equality, and it needs to tell userspace about the pid and uid of incoming transactions. To read kuids from a `struct task_struct`, you must currently use various #defines that perform the appropriate field access under an RCU read lock. Currently, we do not have a Rust wrapper for rcu_read_lock, which means that for this patch, there are two ways forward: 1. Inline the methods into Rust code, and use __rcu_read_lock directly rather than the rcu_read_lock wrapper. This gives up lockdep for these usages of RCU. 2. Wrap the various #defines in helpers and call the helpers from Rust. This patch uses the second option. One possible disadvantage of the second option is the possible introduction of speculation gadgets, but as discussed in [1], the risk appears to be acceptable. Of course, once a wrapper for rcu_read_lock is available, it is preferable to use that over either of the two above approaches. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202312080947.674CD2DC7@keescook/ [1] Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-7-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: security: add abstraction for secctxAlice Ryhl
Add an abstraction for viewing the string representation of a security context. This is needed by Rust Binder because it has a feature where a process can view the string representation of the security context for incoming transactions. The process can use that to authenticate incoming transactions, and since the feature is provided by the kernel, the process can trust that the security context is legitimate. This abstraction makes the following assumptions about the C side: * When a call to `security_secid_to_secctx` is successful, it returns a pointer and length. The pointer references a byte string and is valid for reading for that many bytes. * The string may be referenced until `security_release_secctx` is called. * If CONFIG_SECURITY is set, then the three methods mentioned in rust/helpers are available without a helper. (That is, they are not a #define or `static inline`.) Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-5-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: cred: add Rust abstraction for `struct cred`Wedson Almeida Filho
Add a wrapper around `struct cred` called `Credential`, and provide functionality to get the `Credential` associated with a `File`. Rust Binder must check the credentials of processes when they attempt to perform various operations, and these checks usually take a `&Credential` as parameter. The security_binder_set_context_mgr function would be one example. This patch is necessary to access these security_* methods from Rust. This Rust abstraction makes the following assumptions about the C side: * `struct cred` is refcounted with `get_cred`/`put_cred`. * It's okay to transfer a `struct cred` across threads, that is, you do not need to call `put_cred` on the same thread as where you called `get_cred`. * The `euid` field of a `struct cred` never changes after initialization. * The `f_cred` field of a `struct file` never changes after initialization. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-4-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>