diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | 2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch) | |
| tree | c158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | |
| parent | 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 (diff) | |
| parent | 855684c7d938c2442f07eabc154e7532b4c1fbf9 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:
38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:
1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code
... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:
2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree
But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.
So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/tty/serial/imx.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index 4aa72d5aeafb..e14813250616 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c @@ -462,8 +462,7 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port) } } -/* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */ -static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port) +static void imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(struct uart_port *port, bool loopback) { struct imx_port *sport = (struct imx_port *)port; u32 ucr1, ucr2, ucr4, uts; @@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port) /* See SER_RS485_ENABLED/UTS_LOOP comment in imx_uart_probe() */ if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED && port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND && - sport->have_rtscts && !sport->have_rtsgpio) { + sport->have_rtscts && !sport->have_rtsgpio && loopback) { uts = imx_uart_readl(sport, imx_uart_uts_reg(sport)); uts |= UTS_LOOP; imx_uart_writel(sport, uts, imx_uart_uts_reg(sport)); @@ -498,6 +497,16 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port) } /* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */ +static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port) +{ + /* + * Stop RX and enable loopback in order to make sure RS485 bus + * is not blocked. Se comment in imx_uart_probe(). + */ + imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(port, true); +} + +/* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */ static void imx_uart_enable_ms(struct uart_port *port) { struct imx_port *sport = (struct imx_port *)port; @@ -682,9 +691,14 @@ static void imx_uart_start_tx(struct uart_port *port) imx_uart_rts_inactive(sport, &ucr2); imx_uart_writel(sport, ucr2, UCR2); + /* + * Since we are about to transmit we can not stop RX + * with loopback enabled because that will make our + * transmitted data being just looped to RX. + */ if (!(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX) && !port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio) - imx_uart_stop_rx(port); + imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(port, false); sport->tx_state = WAIT_AFTER_RTS; |