summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100
commit2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch)
treec158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
parent428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 (diff)
parent855684c7d938c2442f07eabc154e7532b4c1fbf9 (diff)
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>: 38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better than the original commit: 1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code ... which was also done by an internal merge resolution: 2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block. So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's tree and follow his conflict resolution. Conflicts: arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/tty/serial/imx.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/tty/serial/imx.c22
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
index 4aa72d5aeafb..e14813250616 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
@@ -462,8 +462,7 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
}
}
-/* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */
-static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port)
+static void imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(struct uart_port *port, bool loopback)
{
struct imx_port *sport = (struct imx_port *)port;
u32 ucr1, ucr2, ucr4, uts;
@@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port)
/* See SER_RS485_ENABLED/UTS_LOOP comment in imx_uart_probe() */
if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED &&
port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND &&
- sport->have_rtscts && !sport->have_rtsgpio) {
+ sport->have_rtscts && !sport->have_rtsgpio && loopback) {
uts = imx_uart_readl(sport, imx_uart_uts_reg(sport));
uts |= UTS_LOOP;
imx_uart_writel(sport, uts, imx_uart_uts_reg(sport));
@@ -498,6 +497,16 @@ static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port)
}
/* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */
+static void imx_uart_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+ /*
+ * Stop RX and enable loopback in order to make sure RS485 bus
+ * is not blocked. Se comment in imx_uart_probe().
+ */
+ imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(port, true);
+}
+
+/* called with port.lock taken and irqs off */
static void imx_uart_enable_ms(struct uart_port *port)
{
struct imx_port *sport = (struct imx_port *)port;
@@ -682,9 +691,14 @@ static void imx_uart_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
imx_uart_rts_inactive(sport, &ucr2);
imx_uart_writel(sport, ucr2, UCR2);
+ /*
+ * Since we are about to transmit we can not stop RX
+ * with loopback enabled because that will make our
+ * transmitted data being just looped to RX.
+ */
if (!(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX) &&
!port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio)
- imx_uart_stop_rx(port);
+ imx_uart_stop_rx_with_loopback_ctrl(port, false);
sport->tx_state = WAIT_AFTER_RTS;