Merge tag 'vfs-6.19-rc1.folio' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs

Pull folio updates from Christian Brauner:
 "Add a new folio_next_pos() helper function that returns the file
  position of the first byte after the current folio. This is a common
  operation in filesystems when needing to know the end of the current
  folio.

  The helper is lifted from btrfs which already had its own version, and
  is now used across multiple filesystems and subsystems:
   - btrfs
   - buffer
   - ext4
   - f2fs
   - gfs2
   - iomap
   - netfs
   - xfs
   - mm

  This fixes a long-standing bug in ocfs2 on 32-bit systems with files
  larger than 2GiB. Presumably this is not a common configuration, but
  the fix is backported anyway. The other filesystems did not have bugs,
  they were just mildly inefficient.

  This also introduce uoff_t as the unsigned version of loff_t. A recent
  commit inadvertently changed a comparison from being unsigned (on
  64-bit systems) to being signed (which it had always been on 32-bit
  systems), leading to sporadic fstests failures.

  Generally file sizes are restricted to being a signed integer, but in
  places where -1 is passed to indicate "up to the end of the file", it
  is convenient to have an unsigned type to ensure comparisons are
  always unsigned regardless of architecture"

* tag 'vfs-6.19-rc1.folio' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs:
  fs: Add uoff_t
  mm: Use folio_next_pos()
  xfs: Use folio_next_pos()
  netfs: Use folio_next_pos()
  iomap: Use folio_next_pos()
  gfs2: Use folio_next_pos()
  f2fs: Use folio_next_pos()
  ext4: Use folio_next_pos()
  buffer: Use folio_next_pos()
  btrfs: Use folio_next_pos()
  filemap: Add folio_next_pos()

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index b925da738afd..7361d5d890d2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static noinline int lock_delalloc_folios(struct inode *inode,
 				goto out;
 			}
 			range_start = max_t(u64, folio_pos(folio), start);
-			range_len = min_t(u64, folio_end(folio), end + 1) - range_start;
+			range_len = min_t(u64, folio_next_pos(folio), end + 1) - range_start;
 			btrfs_folio_set_lock(fs_info, folio, range_start, range_len);
 
 			processed_end = range_start + range_len - 1;
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ noinline_for_stack bool find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
 	ASSERT(orig_end > orig_start);
 
 	/* The range should at least cover part of the folio */
-	ASSERT(!(orig_start >= folio_end(locked_folio) ||
+	ASSERT(!(orig_start >= folio_next_pos(locked_folio) ||
 		 orig_end <= folio_pos(locked_folio)));
 again:
 	/* step one, find a bunch of delalloc bytes starting at start */
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static void end_folio_read(struct folio *folio, bool uptodate, u64 start, u32 le
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = folio_to_fs_info(folio);
 
 	ASSERT(folio_pos(folio) <= start &&
-	       start + len <= folio_end(folio));
+	       start + len <= folio_next_pos(folio));
 
 	if (uptodate && btrfs_verify_folio(folio, start, len))
 		btrfs_folio_set_uptodate(fs_info, folio, start, len);
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static bool can_skip_one_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 	 * finished our folio read and unlocked the folio.
 	 */
 	if (btrfs_folio_test_dirty(fs_info, folio, cur, blocksize)) {
-		u64 range_len = min(folio_end(folio),
+		u64 range_len = umin(folio_next_pos(folio),
 				    ordered->file_offset + ordered->num_bytes) - cur;
 
 		ret = true;
@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static bool can_skip_one_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 	 * So we return true and update @next_ret to the OE/folio boundary.
 	 */
 	if (btrfs_folio_test_uptodate(fs_info, folio, cur, blocksize)) {
-		u64 range_len = min(folio_end(folio),
+		u64 range_len = umin(folio_next_pos(folio),
 				    ordered->file_offset + ordered->num_bytes) - cur;
 
 		/*
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack void write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
 	for (int i = 0; i < num_extent_folios(eb); i++) {
 		struct folio *folio = eb->folios[i];
 		u64 range_start = max_t(u64, eb->start, folio_pos(folio));
-		u32 range_len = min_t(u64, folio_end(folio),
+		u32 range_len = min_t(u64, folio_next_pos(folio),
 				      eb->start + eb->len) - range_start;
 
 		folio_lock(folio);
@@ -2624,7 +2624,7 @@ void extent_write_locked_range(struct inode *inode, const struct folio *locked_f
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		cur_end = min_t(u64, folio_end(folio) - 1, end);
+		cur_end = min_t(u64, folio_next_pos(folio) - 1, end);
 		cur_len = cur_end + 1 - cur;
 
 		ASSERT(folio_test_locked(folio));
@@ -3865,7 +3865,7 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages_nowait(struct extent_buffer *eb, int mirror_num,
 	for (int i = 0; i < num_extent_folios(eb); i++) {
 		struct folio *folio = eb->folios[i];
 		u64 range_start = max_t(u64, eb->start, folio_pos(folio));
-		u32 range_len = min_t(u64, folio_end(folio),
+		u32 range_len = min_t(u64, folio_next_pos(folio),
 				      eb->start + eb->len) - range_start;
 
 		bio_add_folio_nofail(&bbio->bio, folio, range_len,