btrfs: convert several int parameters to bool

We're almost done cleaning misused int/bool parameters. Convert a bunch
of them, found by manual grepping.  Note that btrfs_sync_fs() needs an
int as it's mandated by the struct super_operations prototype.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
index 57f52585a6dd..ac28eee7ae32 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ void btrfs_clear_em_logging(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct extent_map *em)
 
 static inline void setup_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 					struct extent_map *em,
-					int modified)
+					bool modified)
 {
 	refcount_inc(&em->refs);
 
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static inline void setup_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
  * taken, or a reference dropped if the merge attempt was successful.
  */
 static int add_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
-			      struct extent_map *em, int modified)
+			      struct extent_map *em, bool modified)
 {
 	struct extent_map_tree *tree = &inode->extent_tree;
 	struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int add_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 }
 
 static struct extent_map *lookup_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *tree,
-						u64 start, u64 len, int strict)
+						u64 start, u64 len, bool strict)
 {
 	struct extent_map *em;
 	struct rb_node *rb_node;
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static struct extent_map *lookup_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *tree,
 struct extent_map *btrfs_lookup_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *tree,
 					       u64 start, u64 len)
 {
-	return lookup_extent_mapping(tree, start, len, 1);
+	return lookup_extent_mapping(tree, start, len, true);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_lookup_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *tree,
 struct extent_map *btrfs_search_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *tree,
 					       u64 start, u64 len)
 {
-	return lookup_extent_mapping(tree, start, len, 0);
+	return lookup_extent_mapping(tree, start, len, false);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct extent_map *e
 static void replace_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 				   struct extent_map *cur,
 				   struct extent_map *new,
-				   int modified)
+				   bool modified)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
 	struct extent_map_tree *tree = &inode->extent_tree;
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static noinline int merge_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 	em->len = end - start;
 	if (em->disk_bytenr < EXTENT_MAP_LAST_BYTE)
 		em->offset += start_diff;
-	return add_extent_mapping(inode, em, 0);
+	return add_extent_mapping(inode, em, false);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ int btrfs_add_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 	if (em->disk_bytenr == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE)
 		ASSERT(em->start == 0);
 
-	ret = add_extent_mapping(inode, em, 0);
+	ret = add_extent_mapping(inode, em, false);
 	/* it is possible that someone inserted the extent into the tree
 	 * while we had the lock dropped.  It is also possible that
 	 * an overlapping map exists in the tree
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ int btrfs_split_extent_map(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len, u64 pr
 	split_pre->flags = flags;
 	split_pre->generation = em->generation;
 
-	replace_extent_mapping(inode, em, split_pre, 1);
+	replace_extent_mapping(inode, em, split_pre, true);
 
 	/*
 	 * Now we only have an extent_map at:
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ int btrfs_split_extent_map(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len, u64 pr
 	split_mid->ram_bytes = split_mid->len;
 	split_mid->flags = flags;
 	split_mid->generation = em->generation;
-	add_extent_mapping(inode, split_mid, 1);
+	add_extent_mapping(inode, split_mid, true);
 
 	/* Once for us */
 	btrfs_free_extent_map(em);