diff options
| author | Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com> | 2025-11-13 17:20:32 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2025-11-20 10:26:17 +0100 |
| commit | fec4d9d6ffd297b1ce8f19a8f723f5b0aaac5b3e (patch) | |
| tree | 401eade7c3f76206fa784257e433a1b3b257f65a /net/wireless/sysfs.c | |
| parent | e4582bdf5132ce80e7432d8143f2c321d258e60f (diff) | |
wifi: cfg80211: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
For more details see the Link tag below.
This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
Switch to using system_dfl_wq because system_unbound_wq is going away as part of
a workqueue restructuring.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113162032.394804-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/wireless/sysfs.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/wireless/sysfs.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/wireless/sysfs.c b/net/wireless/sysfs.c index 62f26618f674..8d142856e385 100644 --- a/net/wireless/sysfs.c +++ b/net/wireless/sysfs.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int wiphy_resume(struct device *dev) if (rdev->wiphy.registered && rdev->ops->resume) ret = rdev_resume(rdev); rdev->suspended = false; - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work); + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work); wiphy_unlock(&rdev->wiphy); if (ret) |