| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP guards to make sure this code
doesn't break arch=um builds.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510291919.FFGyU7nq-lkp@intel.com/
|
|
When userspace is interrupted at the start of a function, before we
get a chance to complete the frame, unwind will miss one caller.
X86 has a uprobe specific fixup for this, add bits to the generic
unwinder to support this.
Suggested-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251024145156.GM4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
Use ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME to describe how frame pointers are unwound
on x86, and enable CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP accordingly so the
unwind_user interfaces can be used.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250827193828.347397433@kernel.org
|
